Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Otoriter dan Abusive Supervision terhadap Perilaku Proaktif Bawahan dengan Perceived Powerlessness sebagai Variabel Mediasi: Studi Empiris pada Institusi Kepolisian di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61761/seamac.2.1.33-40Keywords:
kepemimpinan otoriter, perilaku proaktif, kepolisianAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merencanakan, memahami, dan implementasi penerapan manajemen kurikulum sekolah islam terpadu di SDIT Fadhilah Kota Pekanbaru. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi kualitatif karena data disajikan dalam bahasa deskriptif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini dimulai dengan perencanaan kurikulum, prinsip-prinsip manajemen yang digunakan untuk menerapkan manajemen kurikulum sekolah Islam terpadu di SDIT Fadhilah Kota Pekanbaru: memanfaatkan analisis SWOT, lokakarya kurikulum, menyusun tim untuk membuat kurikulum, dan membuat kurikulum akhir; Kedua, membuat kurikulum: Langkah selanjutnya dalam mempraktekkan kurikulum adalah melakukan evaluasi diri sekolah (EDS), kemudian membuat kalender pendidikan, RPP, program kegiatan sekolah, tugas guru, dan tim untuk menyusun dan mengembangkan dokumen. Keempat, supervisi dan evaluasi kurikulum, khususnya pengembangan guru di bawah supervisi, evaluasi kinerja, pengukuran sikap, penggunaan portofolio, dan self assessment hasil kerja, serta penilaian pencapaian kompetensi siswa melalui tes tertulis, lisan, dan tidak tertulis. Guru melaksanakan kurikulum sesuai dengan tugas dan jadwal yang telah ditetapkan dengan menggunakan pola kurikulum terpadu.
References
Anderson, C., John, O.P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The Personal Sense of Power. Journal of Personality, 80: 313-344.
Balser, D.B., & Stern, R.N. (1999). Resistance and Cooperation: A Response to Conflict Over Job Performance. Human Relations, 52: 1029-1053.
Black, D. (1984). Social Control as a Dependent Variable. In D. Black (Ed.), Toward a general theory of social control, Vol. 1: 1-29. London: Academic Press.
Bowen, D.E., Ledford, G. E., Jr., & Nathan, B.R. (1991). Hiring for the Organization, not the job. Academy of Management Executive, 5: 35-51.
Burris, E.R., Detert, J.R., & Chiaburu, D.S. (2008). Quitting Before Leaving: The Mediating Effects of Psychological Attachment and Detachment on Voice. Journal of applied psychology, 93(4), 912.
Cheng, B.S., Chou, L.F., Huang, M.P., Farh, J.L., & Peng, S. (2003). A Triad Model of Paternalistic Leadership: Evidence from Business Organizations in Mainland China. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 20: 209-250
De Hoogh, A.H., & Den Hartog, D.N. (2009). Neuroticism and Locus of Control as Moderators of The Relationships of Charismatic and Autocratic Leadership with Burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94: 1058-1067.
Diefenbach, T., & Sillince, J.A.A. (2011). Formal and Informal Hierarchy in Different Types of Organization. Organization Studies, 32: 1515-1537.
Farh, C.I.C., & Chen, Z. (2014). Beyond the Individual Victim: Multilevel Consequences of Abusive Supervision in Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99: 1074-1095.
Ferris, G.R., Zinko, R., Brouer, R.L., Buckley, M.R., & Harvey, M.G. (2007). Strategic Bullying as a Supplementary, Balanced Perspective on Destructive Leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 18: 195-206.
Fortado, B. (1994). Informal Supervisory Social Control Strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 32: 252-274.
Frazier, M.L., & Bowler, W.M. (2015). Voice Climate, Supervisor Undermining, and Work Outcomes: A group-level Examination. Journal of Management, 41: 841- 863.
French, J.R.P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of Social Power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power: 150-167. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that Gets Results. Harvard Business Review, 78: 78- 90.
Grant, A.M., & Ashford, S.J. (2008). The Dynamics of Proactivity at Work. In B.M. Staw & A.P. Brief (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 28: 3-34. New York: Elsevier.
Griffin, M.A., Neal, A., & Parker, S.K. (2007). A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 327-347.
Jones, G.R. (1983). Forms of Control and Leader Behavior. Journal of Management, 9: 159-172.
Khan, A.K., Moss, S., Quratulain, S., & Hameed, I. (2018). When and How Subordinate Performance Leads to Abusive Supervision: A Social Dominance Perspective. Journal of Management, 44: 2801-2826.
Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 342-369.
Li, N., Chiaburu, D.S., & Kirkman, B.L. (2017). Cross-level Influences of Empowering Leadership on Citizenship Behavior: Organizational Support Climate as A Double-edged Sword. Journal of Management, 43: 1076-1102.
Lian, H., Brown, D.J., Ferris, D.L., Liang, L., Keeping, L.M., & Morrison, R.J. (2014). Abusive Supervision and Retaliation: A Self-control Framework. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 116-139.
Lian, H., Ferris, D.L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does Taking the Good with the Bad Make Things Worse? How Abusive Supervision and Leader-member Exchange Interact to Impact Need Satisfaction and Organizational Deviance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117: 41-52.
Liu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The Dark Side of Leadership: A Three-level Investigation of The Cascading Effect of Abusive Supervision on Employee Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1187-1212.
Ouyang, H., Mao, J., Zhou, Z., & Su, H. (2015). Late Mesozoic Metallogeny and Intracontinental Magmatism, Southern Great Xing'an Range, northeastern China. Gondwana Research, 27(3): 1153-1172.
Parker, S.K., & Collins, C.G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors. Journal of Management, 36: 633-662.
Schaubroeck, J.M., Shen, Y.M., & Chong, S. (2017). A dual-stage Moderated Mediation Model Linking Authoritarian Leadership to Follower Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102: 203-214.
Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., Pirttila-Backman, A., & Lipsanen, J. (2011). Reciprocity of Trust in the Supervisor-Subordinate Relationship: The mediating role of autonomy and the sense of power. Europ
Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 1442- 1465.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V.E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS Path Modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1): 159-205.
Tepper, B.J., Carr, J.C., Breaux, D.M., Geider, S., Hu, C., & Hua, W. (2009). Abusive Supervision, Intentions to Quit, and Employees’ Workplace Deviance: A Power/Dependence Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109: 156-167.
Walter, F., Lam, C.K., van der Vegt, G.S., Huang, X., & Miao, Q. (2015). Abusive Supervision and Subordinate Performance: Instrumentality Considerations in the Emergence and Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100: 1056-1072.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
Zhang, H.P., Kwan, H.K., Zhang, X. M., & Wu, L.Z. (2014). High Core Self-Evaluators Maintain Creativity: A Motivational Model of Abusive Supervision. Journal of Management, 40: 1151-1174.
Zhang, Y., Huai, M, & Xie, Y. (2015). Paternalistic Leadership and Employee Voice in China: A Dual Process Model. Leadership Quarterly, 26: 25-36.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Josina Lambiombir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
